Re: Backcountry Management Plan
Interesting separation of OK staff and not-OK staff that you make. If
you don't mind I'm not very good at making those distinctions. If
someone come up with...
aguabug 2002-05-03 11:57:28 #14892
Re: Backcountry Management Plan
Bob ---
If you go back to what I wrote you will see that this time line was
agreed to in the lawsuit settlement. If you are unhappy about the
settlement...
bob41_2001 2002-05-03 10:09:32 #14891
Re: Backcountry Management Plan
I'm not in disagreement with your overall comments.
But, from reading it, the NPS staff put a large amount of effort into
the unused Backcountry Plan. So...
Ken McNamara 2002-05-03 08:24:19 #14890
Re: Backcountry Management Plan
No Ken, the continued lack of management effort without the threat of
lawsuits is unfair to the public. Decisions made by default (doing
nothing) are...
aguabug 2002-05-03 08:04:14 #14889
Re: New to the group..and the Canyon
Here's another vote for Tina's plan. And be SURE to check out Zion.
ChuckTo add to what Tina said, I would definitely recommend
you do North to South. Not the...
Charles Bame 2002-05-03 04:52:03 #14888
Re: Backcountry Management Plan
Having read the detailed backcountry plan that the NPS staff put
together - (a lot of work went into it) - I'd guess that they are more
frustrated by this...
Ken McNamara 2002-05-03 02:43:54 #14887
Re: Backcountry Management Plan
Guess the NPS staff won't do their job unless they are forced to by a
lawsuit, and even then very slowly.
As I recall similar thinking lead to the CRMP...
aguabug 2002-05-02 19:43:54 #14886
Archive of Grand_Canyon_Hikers Yahoo Group as of 2014-10-07. Contact info@e-t.com for help.