Re: Bob Ribokas photography (OT - cameras)
ended up with blocked shadows.
Yes, it definitely takes experience to realize which composition
will end up with limited enough dynamic range to fit on...
johngeyles 2005-03-12 15:59:32 #35558
Re: Question & rant on development in the grand can...
payers pay dearly and do not get any benefit ...
Ah, but the rich are rich because they are morally superior,
otherwise God wouldn't have made them rich. ...
johngeyles 2005-03-12 15:54:55 #35557
Re: Bob Ribokas photography (OT - cameras)
But there's nothing quite as awesome as a projected slide.
> Except maybe a macro shot blown up to a size suitable to hang on the
> wall.
Yeah, but it...
johngeyles 2005-03-12 15:51:36 #35556
Possible new Grand Canyon trail funding
Story @
http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/0311az-highways11.html
gcclimbing 2005-03-12 12:42:40 #35555
Re: Bob Ribokas photography (OT - cameras)
Is that ever true.
Thanks for pointing out that even if we come up with ever more
sophisticated cameras the vision (ability to produce images folks
enjoy...
Bob Marley 2005-03-12 07:25:41 #35554
Re: Bob Ribokas photography (OT - cameras)
Film is stagnent and digital is improving every day. Draw you own
> conclusion. FILM IS DEAD.
Bob -
From a technical standpoint you are correct.
I...
Kenneth McNamara 2005-03-12 07:05:45 #35553
Re: Bob Ribokas photography (OT - cameras)
--- In Grand_Canyon_Hikers@yahoogroups.com, "johngeyles"
wrote:
> ...
> In the digital darkroom, one can scan color material and then
> go to B&W from...
Bob Marley 2005-03-11 19:40:38 #35552
Archive of Grand_Canyon_Hikers Yahoo Group as of 2014-10-07. Contact info@e-t.com for help.