Re: advice welcome
In a message dated 11/1/00 7:24:40 AM, Rosesand@... writes:
<<I'm inexperienced but eager.>>
This egroup list is great for anything about;...
DeltaJH@aol.com 2000-11-01 16:25:57 #4893
Re: Mule Sinners
In a message dated 11/1/00 5:35:37 PM, pgutkin@... writes:
<<So if you're looking for my suggestion? Require potential mule
riders to show proof...
DeltaJH@aol.com 2000-11-01 16:14:11 #4892
Re: Mule Sinners
Bob,
I answered that in the first paragraph.
***It's the 95% of the young, healthy, lazy riders who are paying the
fee for an effortless trip in and...
pgutkin@snet.net 2000-11-01 15:34:30 #4891
Re: Mule Sinners
Weak argument to sterotype the .gov email address.
In grandcanyon@egroups.com, "Jerry Dickey" wrote:
5. I didn't much like the response of the person who...
Pernell 2000-11-01 15:17:44 #4890
WG: [grandcanyon] Mules stink less than people
Donald,
<<
Without advocates, commercial interests will
prevail!
>>
I fully agree. Imagine a elevator or tramway down to the Colorado, take...
Oskarvoca 2000-11-01 12:46:20 #4889
Re: Mules stink less than people
Perhaps a bit of long term view might be helpful. My interest in the canyon
started in 1964 when we were active to keep two large dams out of the grand...
donaldpvadair@cs.com 2000-11-01 12:16:29 #4888
Re: Mules stink less than people
Andrew -
Right on! Squish, squish, squish
KenMc
andrew.j.hodge@... wrote:
>
> Aren't there bigger battles to fight? What's the big deal with a
> little...
conmara 2000-11-01 11:12:05 #4887
Archive of Grand_Canyon_Hikers Yahoo Group as of 2014-10-07. Contact info@e-t.com for help.