Re: Mule Sinners
Yep! You're right. It was stereotyping and a weak argument. While some of my best friends may not be mules....some of them DO work for the gummit! Anyway, I...
Jerry Dickey 2000-11-01 18:56:39 #4895

Re: WG: [grandcanyon] Mules stink less than people
kThanks.
donaldpvadair@cs.com 2000-11-01 18:14:54 #4894

Re: advice welcome
In a message dated 11/1/00 7:24:40 AM, Rosesand@... writes: <<I'm inexperienced but eager.>> This egroup list is great for anything about;...
DeltaJH@aol.com 2000-11-01 16:25:57 #4893

Re: Mule Sinners
In a message dated 11/1/00 5:35:37 PM, pgutkin@... writes: <<So if you're looking for my suggestion? Require potential mule riders to show proof...
DeltaJH@aol.com 2000-11-01 16:14:11 #4892

Re: Mule Sinners
Bob, I answered that in the first paragraph. ***It's the 95% of the young, healthy, lazy riders who are paying the fee for an effortless trip in and...
pgutkin@snet.net 2000-11-01 15:34:30 #4891

Re: Mule Sinners
Weak argument to sterotype the .gov email address. In grandcanyon@egroups.com, "Jerry Dickey" wrote: 5. I didn't much like the response of the person who...
Pernell 2000-11-01 15:17:44 #4890

WG: [grandcanyon] Mules stink less than people
Donald, << Without advocates, commercial interests will prevail! >> I fully agree. Imagine a elevator or tramway down to the Colorado, take...
Oskarvoca 2000-11-01 12:46:20 #4889

Re: Mules stink less than people
Perhaps a bit of long term view might be helpful. My interest in the canyon started in 1964 when we were active to keep two large dams out of the grand...
donaldpvadair@cs.com 2000-11-01 12:16:29 #4888

<< NewerOlder >>

 

Archive of Grand_Canyon_Hikers Yahoo Group as of 2014-10-07. Contact info@e-t.com for help.