Re: The Costs of Negligence -- NY Times Editorial
David, this is a thought-provoking example, and I think it's difficult for us to judge. I think it's difficult for any of us, and even you, to know how...
johngeyles 2009-01-19 13:18:59 #53751

Re: The Costs of Negligence -- NY Times Editorial
David, Motorized SAR operations are not compatible with Wilderness character, but they are specifically excepted. The taxpayer idea is not relevant. We...
Dick Matthews 2009-01-19 12:00:25 #53750

Re: new home page photo
Ah, it was the unusal curvature that produced my only hesitation-- the area you're walking on and the waterline are much straighter than they appear in the...
mikerogers_vt 2009-01-19 11:36:23 #53749

Re: The Costs of Negligence -- NY Times Editorial
Chris brings up another good point. This thread reminds me of when we talk about "exposure." Along the Nankoweap Trail there is a section where there is a...
astro9073444 2009-01-19 11:36:05 #53748

Re: The Costs of Negligence -- NY Times Editorial
On 01/16/09 22:43, Peter Borremans wrote: > > However, I fully believe that ANY rescue (even an attempt) should be billed > to the party seeking it. [...] ...
Reid Priedhorsky 2009-01-19 09:19:19 #53747

Re: The Costs of Negligence -- NY Times Editorial
[This post sparked more conversation than I'd expected!] Dave, to your point about one-way HELP buttons. In a perfect world we could all afford a sat phone...
chris.forsyth 2009-01-18 22:59:00 #53746

Re: new home page photo
Congratulations goes to Mike - you hit it dead on. Impressive.  It is actually two images shot by team leader Fred Watkins (there were 3 of us) with...
Dr. Brown 2009-01-18 22:38:59 #53745

Re: The Costs of Negligence -- NY Times Editorial
--- In Grand_Canyon_Hikers@yahoogroups.com, "Peter Borremans" wrote: > > Dave, I like the way you write when you're on your soap box:-). Thanks, Pete > ...
David Marcus 2009-01-18 22:08:15 #53744

<< NewerOlder >>

 

Archive of Grand_Canyon_Hikers Yahoo Group as of 2014-10-07. Contact info@e-t.com for help.