Re: [!! SPAM] [Grand_Canyon_Hikers] Re: Permit issues
Chris, I agree that my interpretation of #4 is silly. However your logic and reasoning make you automatically mentally correct the drafting deficiencies. ...
Dick Matthews 2010-01-01 08:41:17 #59095

Re: Permit issues
Here is what Dick said in his original post: "On one trip I was not sure whether it would take four days or five so I applied for a four day permit and my...
Chris F 2009-12-31 21:11:44 #59094

[!! SPAM] [Grand_Canyon_Hikers] Re: Permit issues
And another thing. Compared to the scams the NPS has pulled on hikers' freedoms over the last twenty-one years (introduction of their Planning and Zoning...
oldhakataihobo 2009-12-31 20:44:20 #59093

[!! SPAM] [Grand_Canyon_Hikers] Re: Permit issues
I don't think the affiliated group rules apply to any of us here. First I cannot think of that many people I'd like to hike with at the same time. Second,...
oldhakataihobo 2009-12-31 20:26:43 #59092

[!! SPAM] [Grand_Canyon_Hikers] Re: Permit issues
Dick said they hiked so many nights on one permit and then so many nights on the other permit. They never used both permits on the same night. The affiliated...
kampaz5 2009-12-31 19:09:18 #59091

[!! SPAM] [Grand_Canyon_Hikers] Re: Permit issues
See comments as noted below. --- In Grand_Canyon_Hikers@yahoogroups.com, Dick Matthews wrote: > > Chris, > > It is inappropriate to stereotype tax...
Chris F 2009-12-31 17:11:45 #59090

Re: [!! SPAM] [Grand_Canyon_Hikers] Re: Permit issues
Chris, It is inappropriate to stereotype tax accountants as having an innate aptitude to game the system and receiving perverse pleasure from pulling it...
Dick Matthews 2009-12-31 15:36:34 #59089

Re: Permit issues
I had the same reaction when I saw this -- you were avoiding the possible violation of 1 permit condition, with the certain violation of another, with the...
DougN 2009-12-31 15:25:30 #59088

<< NewerOlder >>

 

Archive of Grand_Canyon_Hikers Yahoo Group as of 2014-10-07. Contact info@e-t.com for help.