Backpacker to Introduce a New Magazine: Grand Canyon Journal
I just saw a blurb about this in the new issue. Apparently coming this spring. What will this do to backcountry permits and the Backpacker effect on people...
JoshC 2012-01-07 09:06:56 #67813

Re: Updated list of Redwall routes
True, I was kinda stumped what to say about the separation between 3.0+ Papago and 5.3 Cranberry -- no rope, not for hikers anyway, either place. On Jan 6,...
Doug Nering 2012-01-06 22:20:09 #67812

Updated list of Redwall routes should be obtained by sweat, not inte
I don't mean this as an insult, so just indulge me as I get a little crotchety (you know, the old "you'll shoot your eye out" thing). I just don't like the...
oldehakataihobo 2012-01-06 20:04:39 #67811

Re: Updated list of Redwall routes
Tom, Yes, I think that reordering the criteria would make sense. And I like the "GC:" prefix so that it is clear. I'd like to propose: GC: {Climbing...
brian_alleyne 2012-01-06 12:05:49 #67810

Re: Updated list of Redwall routes
May I suggest - - using a standard arabic number for two different things seems like a possible problem. Perhaps A, B, C would do for that. Or perhaps...
TomJones 2012-01-06 10:45:57 #67809

Re: Updated list of Redwall routes
I totally agree with both Dave and Bob: subjectivity (more inputs we get, the more reliable will be the consensus) good routefinding is essential: even the...
brian_alleyne 2012-01-06 10:13:29 #67808

Re: Updated list of Redwall routes
Bob makes a few good points. We already know how subjective this list could become. It seems as we almost need to add one additional unit of measure, and...
JoshC 2012-01-06 09:44:24 #67807

Re: Updated list of Redwall routes
I think you are onto something Dave. In various conversations I have seen people think things are much more difficult than they actually seemed to me. Frankly...
Bob Marley 2012-01-06 09:35:32 #67806

<< NewerOlder >>

 

Archive of Grand_Canyon_Hikers Yahoo Group as of 2014-10-07. Contact info@e-t.com for help.