Re: Anyone else? Was: The argument about Deer Creek
The administrative closure by the NPS was based on their loose
interpretation of the 1994 Amendment of AIRFA. Section 3(A)subsection
(d) on page 4 of the...
Old Hakatai Hobo 2012-05-24 01:07:31 #69517
Re: Anyone else? Was: The argument about Deer Creek
--- In Grand_Canyon_Hikers@yahoogroups.com, "rich_rudow" wrote:
>
> Hi Jerry, the hiking distance is 8 miles so it's too far to legally packraft. There is...
Jerry 2012-05-24 00:56:42 #69516
A silly question
If one was to show up this coming Saturday morning at the North Rim backcountry
window and asked for a permit to spend a night somewhere near Deer Creek...
Anton Solovyev 2012-05-24 00:55:56 #69515
Re: Deer Creek narrows and handprints
--- In Grand_Canyon_Hikers@yahoogroups.com, "dmarcus2@..." wrote:
>
> On a related subject, see messages 2484 and 4764 for more about the handprints at Deer...
Jerry 2012-05-24 00:10:41 #69514
Re: Anyone else? Was: The argument about Deer Creek
--- In Grand_Canyon_Hikers@yahoogroups.com, "TomJones"
>
> It's kinda dumb to go visit the Grand Canyon, and go hiking there, when there's a perfectly good...
Jerry 2012-05-24 00:05:50 #69513
Native Beliefs and Sacred Fish
Thought this was an interesting and somewhat relevant note in the NY Times today, concerning the objections of native tribes to the management of fish in the...
Dan 2012-05-23 23:14:17 #69512
Re: Anyone else? Was: The argument about Deer Creek
The Access Fund's document specifically states a Nevada Federal District Court had ruled against the lawsuit, thus upholding the legality of the climbing ban....
Bill Ferris 2012-05-23 22:37:05 #69511
Archive of Grand_Canyon_Hikers Yahoo Group as of 2014-10-07. Contact info@e-t.com for help.