Re: Anyone else? Was: The argument about Deer Creek
Steve, in recent posts you've treated other members of the group derisively, described your own words as "threats," condescendingly referred to a Native...
Bill Ferris 2012-05-25 20:29:59 #69569
Re: Anyone else? Was: The argument about Deer Creek
    Everyone here deserves respect. To claim otherwise only angers people and make them unwilling to hear anything you have to say. I am...
Marsha Kesselring 2012-05-25 20:27:52 #69568
Re: Anyone else? Was: The argument about Deer Creek
There were two lawsuits associated with the events at Devils Tower:
The NPS instituted a VOLUNTARY closure, a request for non-climbing, with climbers for the...
TomJones 2012-05-25 18:33:47 #69567
Re: Anyone else? Was: The argument about Deer Creek
I agree, the Grand Canyon belongs to all of us and we all deserve equality when it comes to it's many uses. More than that, we deserve transparency as to...
mccumberj 2012-05-25 18:27:37 #69566
Re: Anyone else? Was: The argument about Deer Creek
--- In Grand_Canyon_Hikers@yahoogroups.com, Steve Carr wrote:
>
> And last, I do not make hollow threats. I will be with Secretary Salazar on June 19th,...
TomJones 2012-05-25 18:21:58 #69565
Re: Photo
It was just a thought I couldn't hold back. The rock still looks like limestone to me and just can't think which of the several possibilities -- but can't be...
Doug Nering 2012-05-25 18:19:10 #69564
Re: Anyone else? Was: The argument about Deer Creek
Well, you can ignore the troll, but not the gatekeeper, Bubbah. And I will
make sure the Secretary gets the whole skinny. I'm sure he will find it
all very,...
Steve Carr 2012-05-25 18:11:25 #69563
Archive of Grand_Canyon_Hikers Yahoo Group as of 2014-10-07. Contact info@e-t.com for help.