Re: Photo
Well that post was even dumber than my first guess, nevermind. On May 25, 2012, at 18:19, Doug Nering wrote: > It was just a thought I couldn't hold back....
Doug Nering 2012-05-25 21:45:56 #69572

Re: Anyone else? Was: The argument about Deer Creek
In the 5 years since Wayne and Bob H. lightly scolded me on my first post, I have been eagerly reading every message on this board, and developed...
Jeff 2012-05-25 21:24:41 #69571

Re: Photo
The rock (slab) in the foreground looks VERY limestone to me. The resolution isn't good enough to be sure, but it looks carnivorous. No signs of any...
Andrew 2012-05-25 20:55:26 #69570

Re: Anyone else? Was: The argument about Deer Creek
Steve, in recent posts you've treated other members of the group derisively, described your own words as "threats," condescendingly referred to a Native...
Bill Ferris 2012-05-25 20:29:59 #69569

Re: Anyone else? Was: The argument about Deer Creek
    Everyone here deserves respect. To claim otherwise only angers people and make them unwilling to hear anything you have to say. I am...
Marsha Kesselring 2012-05-25 20:27:52 #69568

Re: Anyone else? Was: The argument about Deer Creek
There were two lawsuits associated with the events at Devils Tower: The NPS instituted a VOLUNTARY closure, a request for non-climbing, with climbers for the...
TomJones 2012-05-25 18:33:47 #69567

Re: Anyone else? Was: The argument about Deer Creek
I agree, the Grand Canyon belongs to all of us and we all deserve equality when it comes to it's many uses. More than that, we deserve transparency as to...
mccumberj 2012-05-25 18:27:37 #69566

Re: Anyone else? Was: The argument about Deer Creek
--- In Grand_Canyon_Hikers@yahoogroups.com, Steve Carr wrote: > > And last, I do not make hollow threats. I will be with Secretary Salazar on June 19th,...
TomJones 2012-05-25 18:21:58 #69565

<< NewerOlder >>

 

Archive of Grand_Canyon_Hikers Yahoo Group as of 2014-10-07. Contact info@e-t.com for help.