Re: Tuckup's Cottonwood Canyon
That would be good and certainly all that webbing and rope does not have to be left behind. I've torn it down in the past and climbed it when no ropes or...
Bob Marley 2013-02-27 19:07:04 #72195
Re: Tuckup's Cottonwood Canyon
Unfortunately not all anchors are retrievable. Trust me, i am a huge proponent of making every attempt to do ascents and descents "clean" and not leave...
Keith Peterson 2013-02-27 18:26:28 #72194
Re: Big-W wilderness
This is the same premise used to close the Boundary Road (it is adjacent to a PROPOSED wilderness area). My sensitive subject...
Note the Superintendent's...
JoshC 2013-02-27 17:08:22 #72193
Re: Big-W wilderness
Yes, or, pretty close. It must be managed to maintain its Wilderness Characteristics. Slightly different. For instance, motors can be used in a proposed...
TomJones 2013-02-27 16:21:54 #72192
Re: Big-W wilderness
--- In Grand_Canyon_Hikers@yahoogroups.com, "rich_rudow" wrote:
>
>
> First, Grand Canyon is not Wilderness. It is "proposed" Wilderness waiting for...
tiredsole51 2013-02-27 13:12:58 #72191
Re: Tuckup's Cottonwood Canyon
--- In Grand_Canyon_Hikers@yahoogroups.com, "Old Hakatai Hobo"
> If you don't know how to set up your anchor for retreival on a one way trip, you're...
Scott 2013-02-27 10:24:05 #72190
Re: Big-W Wilderness
I believe that "true wilderness" is an unreachable goal. So is "Leave no trace".
Once mankind enters a place there will be a trace. In areas like the GC...
Steve Nelson 2013-02-27 10:10:02 #72189
Archive of Grand_Canyon_Hikers Yahoo Group as of 2014-10-07. Contact info@e-t.com for help.