Re: Tuckup's Cottonwood Canyon
That seems like a good idea, especially given increased use and possible skill deficiencies associated with new users to a "published" route. --- In...
Bob Marley 2013-02-27 23:06:36 #72198

Re: Tuckup's Cottonwood Canyon
I believe that Royal Arch is an exception and should not be used as the standard by which anchors in general are judged. 1) It is a published route 2) It...
brian_alleyne 2013-02-27 22:19:55 #72197

RRFW Riverwire - Glen Canyon Dam Update
RRFW Riverwire – Glen Canyon Dam Update Feb 2013 February 27, 2013 Glen Canyon Dam/Lake Powell Current Status The unregulated inflow volume to Lake...
riverwirerrfw 2013-02-27 21:29:18 #72196

Re: Tuckup's Cottonwood Canyon
That would be good and certainly all that webbing and rope does not have to be left behind. I've torn it down in the past and climbed it when no ropes or...
Bob Marley 2013-02-27 19:07:04 #72195

Re: Tuckup's Cottonwood Canyon
Unfortunately not all anchors are retrievable. Trust me, i am a huge proponent of making every attempt to do ascents and descents "clean" and not leave...
Keith Peterson 2013-02-27 18:26:28 #72194

Re: Big-W wilderness
This is the same premise used to close the Boundary Road (it is adjacent to a PROPOSED wilderness area). My sensitive subject... Note the Superintendent's...
JoshC 2013-02-27 17:08:22 #72193

Re: Big-W wilderness
Yes, or, pretty close. It must be managed to maintain its Wilderness Characteristics. Slightly different. For instance, motors can be used in a proposed...
TomJones 2013-02-27 16:21:54 #72192

Re: Big-W wilderness
--- In Grand_Canyon_Hikers@yahoogroups.com, "rich_rudow" wrote: > > > First, Grand Canyon is not Wilderness. It is "proposed" Wilderness waiting for...
tiredsole51 2013-02-27 13:12:58 #72191

<< NewerOlder >>

 

Archive of Grand_Canyon_Hikers Yahoo Group as of 2014-10-07. Contact info@e-t.com for help.