Re: Tuckup's Cottonwood Canyon
This is why I prefer pitons. You can rig an upward pull point in most places and place your anchor piton such that it has less force holding it in in the...
Old Hakatai Hobo 2013-02-28 09:22:06 #72201

Re: Tuckup's Cottonwood Canyon
The Royal Arch "rappel" is a bad example on my part and did not make my point well. I was not supporting the webbing nests that accumulate there. Excess...
Scott 2013-02-28 08:57:52 #72200

Re: Royal Arch Report
Thanks for sharing. I wasn't aware one could safely get to the River down Copper without aid. Also, I've taken the usual Tonto shortcut to Bass rapids but...
Frank Feagans 2013-02-28 06:40:46 #72199

Re: Tuckup's Cottonwood Canyon
That seems like a good idea, especially given increased use and possible skill deficiencies associated with new users to a "published" route. --- In...
Bob Marley 2013-02-27 23:06:36 #72198

Re: Tuckup's Cottonwood Canyon
I believe that Royal Arch is an exception and should not be used as the standard by which anchors in general are judged. 1) It is a published route 2) It...
brian_alleyne 2013-02-27 22:19:55 #72197

RRFW Riverwire - Glen Canyon Dam Update
RRFW Riverwire – Glen Canyon Dam Update Feb 2013 February 27, 2013 Glen Canyon Dam/Lake Powell Current Status The unregulated inflow volume to Lake...
riverwirerrfw 2013-02-27 21:29:18 #72196

Re: Tuckup's Cottonwood Canyon
That would be good and certainly all that webbing and rope does not have to be left behind. I've torn it down in the past and climbed it when no ropes or...
Bob Marley 2013-02-27 19:07:04 #72195

Re: Tuckup's Cottonwood Canyon
Unfortunately not all anchors are retrievable. Trust me, i am a huge proponent of making every attempt to do ascents and descents "clean" and not leave...
Keith Peterson 2013-02-27 18:26:28 #72194

<< NewerOlder >>

 

Archive of Grand_Canyon_Hikers Yahoo Group as of 2014-10-07. Contact info@e-t.com for help.