Re: R-r and other long-distance runners and hiker: We need a new pol
Good points, Rich. A few comments...
> 1 - ... Interestingly enough, the corridor is (unfortunately) NOT proposed Wilderness. ... I don't know how the...
DennisF 2013-06-19 22:44:42 #73316
Re: R-r and other long-distance runners and hikers: We need a new po
On Jun 18, 2013, at 10:42 PM, jan_swafford wrote:
> Good points coming up. Please add more.
Making sure NPS listens to all of...
Mimi Morris 2013-06-19 22:44:10 #73315
Re: R-r and other long-distance runners and hikers: We need a new po
Josh, fair points. But it all comes down to the protection of the resource as you stated in your earlier post. If the resource is being impacted now, then...
rich_rudow 2013-06-19 17:31:16 #73314
Re: R-r and other long-distance runners and hiker: We need a new pol
Just specifically on this: the Corridor has way too much human impact, permanent structures, power, water, etc -- just plain too 'civilized'. It does-not...
DougN 2013-06-19 17:28:30 #73313
Re: R-r and other long-distance runners and hikers: We need a new po
Where are all of these volunteers going to come from that sit in (3) different locations, daily, to 'check' for reservations? Where will they stay every...
JoshC 2013-06-19 15:30:46 #73312
Re: symposium
Looking forward to getting a copy of this! The presentations were fantastic, so I am sure this book is also!
-Josh
--- In...
JoshC 2013-06-19 15:07:29 #73311
Re: R-r and other long-distance runners and hikers: We need a new po
Good discussion! To try to get it back on track a bit: I and probably
nobody is suggesting banning r-r dayhikers and, as far as I'm concerned,
banning runners...
jan_swafford 2013-06-19 14:52:02 #73310
Archive of Grand_Canyon_Hikers Yahoo Group as of 2014-10-07. Contact info@e-t.com for help.